4 ms·
Considering that those sites both have much more objective coverage, yes. That being said, there is considerable evidence of corruption at Gawker. http://www.
by sb057 12y ago
Considering that those sites both have much more objective coverage, yes.
That being said, there is considerable evidence of corruption at Gawker.
http://www.historyofgamergate.com/kotaku-in-action.html http://www.historyofgamergate.com/kotaku-in-action.html
- ijk 12y agoThere's no corruption on the part of Kotaku described at that link. None. It's also excellent evidence that this is all about harassing Zoe Quinn and has nothing to do with ethics or journalism.
- applewut 12y agoNo corruption at all, none, not for years: http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/343871/Corruption-consumer-hate-and-bad-journalism-in-games-journalism/ http://www.tiki-toki.com/timeline/entry/343871/Corruption-co...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]