4 ms·
I am a bit open minded to all of this, and I am trying to hear both sides in the debate. Some of the critique that she receives is good, and is asked by intell
by kawsper 12y ago
I am a bit open minded to all of this, and I am trying to hear both sides in the debate.
Some of the critique that she receives is good, and is asked by intelligent people. But then she goes on to this event and only answer the assholes and trolls: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ah8mhDW6Shs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ah8mhDW6Shs
She would win a lot of respect to me if she answered some of the constructive critique rather than disabling comments on YouTube and only answer assholes. I can understand why she disables comments on YouTube, because YouTube comments are horrible, but she can address it in a video our an article, I think her videos are interesting and to the point but silencing good questions are bad in my opinion.
And since it have to be mentioned: Deaththreats are never acceptable, and criminal behaviour should be punished.
- oe 12y agoI don't understand why Youtube comments even exist. It's not a forum where you could have an intelligent discussion about a topic.
- ben0x539 12y agoWith how much bullshit she's already getting, why'd you think that if she had youtube comments enabled, there'd be anything but more abuse and harassment there? She doesn't owe it to anyone to let trolls make her videos' comments a platform for further abuse. I'm sure she's dealing with ~critique~ she receives appropriately, she just doesn't make herself available as a target to trolls quite as much as the gamergate crowd might like. This looks like a pretty weak attempt to try to turn around the harassment she's facing and portray it as a fault of her own.