> "Low-value crops", eh? Sure, make farmers use water more efficiently, but it seems pretty silly to value the construction of new buildings over the production

> "Low-value crops", eh? Sure, make farmers use water more efficiently, but it seems pretty silly to value the construction of new buildings over the production of food. Is it really that easy? Food >> Buildings? A lot of crops are grown that never end up on your plate - biofuel, exported food, stuff that in the end rots in the silos. It might really be valuable to rethink the priorities here.