3 ms·
Yes, there was: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8452931 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8452931 That announcement implied that the vulnerability was
by cesarb 12y ago
Yes, there was: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8452931 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8452931
That announcement implied that the vulnerability was SSL 3.0 only. Knowing that, the obvious place to look at would be the differences between SSL 3.0 and its successor TLS 1.0.