Look, I don't say it was A-OK that Duncan checked "no" in the form. (Which, by the way, asks the question in several different forms, to try to capture cases wh

Look, I don't say it was A-OK that Duncan checked "no" in the form. (Which, by the way, asks the question in several different forms, to try to capture cases where people were exposed to something, but don't know what to.) But I do wonder why people are so quick to demonize. He was not a highly educated person, he didn't know the woman he was helping and only saw her briefly, and was (or would have been, had he known) terrified of the consequences of checking "yes" on that box, both in terms of what the authorities would do down the line (quite possibly stick him in a decrepit hospital full of people dying of ebola) and what that would mean coming to grips with. I'm also surprised that people so uncritically accept that his coming here was so terrible in any case. I would bet money that his dying in Dallas means he has infected far fewer people than if he had stayed in Liberia. It certainly serves our purposes to convince people that people with ebola should stay put but I've never heard it explained why, objectively, that is actually the case.