4 ms·
So does it go up to a server to transcribe the audio? Is that why it costs $360 a year?
by post_break 12y ago
So does it go up to a server to transcribe the audio? Is that why it costs $360 a year?
- BHSPitMonkey 12y agoThat's also why most businesses won't be able to use it.
- batbomb 12y agoBusinesses can already communicate with a deaf person the same way using humans instead of servers, it's called VPS.
- BHSPitMonkey 12y agoWhat does this have to do with the confidentiality issues that come with sending your full meeting audio and transcripts into the hands of a third party?
- megablast 12y agoI don't get this point, and the point after? Why can businesses not use this, and how does a VPS replace this?
- ObviousScience 12y agoBusinesses (particularly larger ones) are incredibly leery of having internal business communications handled by external parties.
- jschwartzi 12y agoI hope that's an option. I could see this being used to transcribe conversations between groups of hearing people, as in meetings and the like.
- Freeboots 12y agoIts probably running on google speech api, im not very familiar with it, but the calls may be a limited / paid sevice