It's reasonable to believe that "the building where you can ascend the furthest" is taller than "the building which would first puncture a descending dirigible"

It's reasonable to believe that "the building where you can ascend the furthest" is taller than "the building which would first puncture a descending dirigible". The formal definition of "Height to Architectural Top" from the CTBUH requires 5 footnotes and a committee to decide whether the top features of a building are "architectural" or not. And who put them in charge, anyway?