3 ms·
Speak for yourself. I, personally, discovered through direct and firsthand experience that being a well-behaved actor was a losing strategy. Then I stopped to
by Kalium 12y ago
Speak for yourself. I, personally, discovered through direct and firsthand experience that being a well-behaved actor was a losing strategy.
Then I stopped to think about it and understood why.
- shkkmo 12y agoI did speak for myself, you were the one that presumed to speak for me.
- Kalium 12y agoExcuse me. "Many men, though not all, because some Thing Differently, though judging by available statistics most..." Happy? Or would you prefer #NotAllMen?
- GFK_of_xmaspast 12y agoDon't neg me, bro.
- shkkmo 12y agoI think what you said in your reply works just fine: "I, personally, discovered..."
- Kalium 12y agoI have no wish to go out of my way to discredit a valid observation about general behavior over a population so you can say #NotAllMen.
- shkkmo 12y agoDo you have any evidence that your behavior is typical of the population?
- insickness 12y ago> men discovered that being a well-behaved actor is a losing strategy on dating sites. The entire seduction and pickup community is based on the idea that women say they want a guy who's nice and plays by the rules but that that isn't what they respond to. They respond to assholes, bad-boys and dominant men. Obviously not every woman, but there are plenty of independent scientific studies to support this theory.
- shkkmo 12y agoI'm aware of those studies, but skeptical of some of their methods and claims. I'm especially skeptical that when they claim causation and not correlation. In any case, there's a big difference between 'spammer' and 'bad-boy' as well as a big difference between demonstrating the success of a strategy and demonstrating it's prevalence. Edit: There may be some good studies demonstrating causation but I am not familiar with them.