3 ms·

It sounds expensive, hectic, and really time-consuming, which raises concerns about the kinds of jobs that one should expect waiting at the end of the chute. I

• VLM 12y ago
  That might tie in with the excellent question of why there's no people with 3-5 years of experience willing to work in those environments. Don't kid me/us that 3 years ago no one knew how to code, or computers were invented six months ago so there are no living people today who started out four years ago, LOL. You can seamstress your whole life, and the seamstress in the article needs to ask herself why her theoretical future employers can't get anyone to work for them longer than 36 months in their environment, in their career field. Also I remember when I only had 3 years experience programming and that was in 1984 and I was... not quite as wise as I am now. Optimistically I'll still be alive in 2044 and looking back at code I wrote in 2014 and asking myself WTF I was thinking, what noob wrote that and signed my name on it, way back in '14. A labor market of 40 or 50 years duration where 3 year olds are being marketed as being senior citizens is another strong indication of "peak of bubble". I'll make a lot of money cleaning up after the kids, so I am grateful, but there should be more to life than spending all my time wearing a mental hazmat suit and wielding a virtual manure shovel.