3 ms·
There were only reasons I found compelling: 10, 12, 15, 20 10 Google has to a certain extent, but I've not seen anything as interesting as digging into the ind
by livingparadox 12y ago
There were only reasons I found compelling: 10, 12, 15, 20
10 Google has to a certain extent, but I've not seen anything as interesting as digging into the individual pose of a picture.
12 I typically use wolfram for. 15 I have yet to have a need for. 19 is interesting, but not something I particularly have use for.
In every other case, the reasons were irrelevant to me (echoing the IDGAF towards all the background-photo related "reasons") or the feature is present in Google. Often better.
So... for me, Google still is my search engine of choice. Especially in regards to reason #1. I took the bingiton challenge, and In every instance of a search query I actually make on an everyday basis, Google either won or tied with bing. Most of those searches are code-related.