It's unfair to blame "the Internet community and dynamic" in general. The community and dynamic are built by the rules of the site. There is a reason that Wikip

It's unfair to blame "the Internet community and dynamic" in general. The community and dynamic are built by the rules of the site. There is a reason that Wikipedia has quality content that would not be possible by a free-for-all editable page. As much as their rules have resulted in the output of a wonderful source of knowledge, it is far from unquestioningly perfect. The worst problem I see is the need for a single consensus on a page. I would prefer, if there was a controversy in a page's community, to split into multiple pages each representing the topic from a clear viewpoint instead of a single page of watered-down groupthink.