> but is it true that the existence of a civil action implies that no crime was committed? Clearly not. However, if a court hasn't decided on the matter, wheth

> but is it true that the existence of a civil action implies that no crime was committed? Clearly not. However, if a court hasn't decided on the matter, whether the act is criminal or not is at least partly a value judgment. My value judgment is that while Microsoft did a lot of horrible stuff in the '90s, none of it warrants the tag "criminal".