3 ms·
Missing it completely. Don't use the existing alphabet and characters. Create a new one that is as simplified as possible. Sure, we'll have a steep learning cur
by jsonmez 12y ago
Missing it completely.
Don't use the existing alphabet and characters.
Create a new one that is as simplified as possible. Sure, we'll have a steep learning curve, but once you learn it...
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- vel0city 12y agoI agree. Graffiti writing on the Palm series of computers should be seen as the inspiration on this. It was an alphabet based on the Latin alphabet, albeit with a few tweaks so that every letter could be achieved with a single stroke. Honestly it didn't even have that big of a learning curve, especially since a lot of Palm cases had the Graffiti writing letters on them and the quick reference was always a tap away. In my experience, it had a very high degree of accuracy. Once I knew the alphabet, I could write on Palm devices as fast as I could on pen and paper. I wonder why there aren't many implementations like Graffiti for stylus-based text input on a lot of computers these days? They're always striving to figure out these complex multi-stroke characters, which often tend to be their downfall on accuracy.
- tiernetworks 12y agoGraffiti is in fact already ported to Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.access_company.graffiti&hl=en https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.access_com... This was a wonderful input method -- there is no need to reinvent this particular wheel.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- dimitar 12y agoor maybe a shorthand system can be adapted for mobile http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shorthand