3 ms·
Well, you would have to type the same gibberish twice though. Besides, I don't think they are claiming to be innovative. I think they just point out there is a
by esolyt 12y ago
Well, you would have to type the same gibberish twice though.
Besides, I don't think they are claiming to be innovative. I think they just point out there is a redundant step which we can remove from the process.