I can't agree with his logic here : "When you say, ‘I have nothing to hide,’ you’re saying, ‘I don’t care about this right.’" How does he arrive at that concl

I can't agree with his logic here : "When you say, ‘I have nothing to hide,’ you’re saying, ‘I don’t care about this right.’" How does he arrive at that conclusion? I have nothing to hide, but I still don't support the violation of these rights. Does he suggest that we instead support some other service or method under the illusion that we are immune from NSA spying?