Sorry for that late reply, IMO, that title was fine, it did it's job well. My rant, etc, was about the stats section in the article itself. It still uses a flat

Sorry for that late reply, IMO, that title was fine, it did it's job well. My rant, etc, was about the stats section in the article itself. It still uses a flat time model, on the scale of N things/day instead of a more representative N things/day (X things/(smaller than day time unit) at peak).