Err, while I agree with most of what you say, I don't see how it's relevant to the article. While I cringed at the headline, the article itself is better. So we

Err, while I agree with most of what you say, I don't see how it's relevant to the article. While I cringed at the headline, the article itself is better. So were you going on the headline alone? (Note: the article is better, as much as something can be better in trying to talk about one of the oldest "mysteries" facing humanity in 5 paragraphs written for an uninformed audience. I agreed with most of the statements of the article but it certainly didn't have time to teach me anything when it's so short.)