4 ms·
"...it's just a less powerful... ...c#..." How so? I use both (my largest C# project was Nokia Maps, largest VB.Net project is my own database + sync engine, a
by Spearchucker 12y ago
"...it's just a less powerful... ...c#..."
How so? I use both (my largest C# project was Nokia Maps, largest VB.Net project is my own database + sync engine, at ~110kloc, spread across Windows Desktop, Windows Phone and WCF sync engine). I've not come across any shortcomings in comparison to C#. Granted I'm using the free editions of Visual Studio, and avoid any third-party components or code. What am I missing?
- wsc981 12y agoI think you can probably achieve the same results with VB compared to C#, but at the cost of writing more code or slower performance.
- Spearchucker 12y agoVB.Net is about as verbose as C#. There can be no perf differences because they both compile to the same bye code. Assuming the dev knows what he/she is doing when optimising for perf in either language.