3 ms·
Nobel Peace Prize laureates are usually taking a stand on controversial topics More accurately, they are usually taking the politically fashionable stand on co
by lexcorvus 12y ago
Nobel Peace Prize laureates are usually taking a stand on controversial topics
More accurately, they are usually taking the politically fashionable stand on controversial topics. If you can imagine a Nobel Peace Prize being granted to a vocal defender of apartheid or a staunch opponent of abortion, you imagine a world very different from the one we live in.
If you think, "and thank God for that", it simply means that your political beliefs are fashionable, too. Being on the "right side of history" just means that your side won. Louis XVI was on the wrong side of history, but that doesn't mean we should all become Jacobins—although, in many ways, we have. (I'd guess the Nobel Peace Prize committee would have little problem endorsing liberté, égalité, fraternité.)
- icebraining 12y agoWangari Maathai, 2004 Nobel Peace Prize laureate, was an opponent of abortion. So was Mother Theresa, of course.
- lexcorvus 12y agoYou're right, and I should have been clearer. I was referring to the implausibility of someone being awarded the Prize for working against abortion. I'm sure many laureates incidentally oppose abortion, but it's hard to imagine the leader of a prominent anti-abortion organization being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for that work.