3 ms·
No I'm not wrong and there mere fact that you mention the exception means you've conceded my point; and those aren't bugs, they're in the spec which means it wa
by gnaritas 12y ago
No I'm not wrong and there mere fact that you mention the exception means you've conceded my point; and those aren't bugs, they're in the spec which means it was never a subset of JS.
> JSON is literally a JS object literal (with the additional requirement that any key be a string).
Which makes it not a JS object literal but a near subset with slightly different rules with unicode strings that make it not even a subset.
- ninjaplease 12y agoWhat spec are you looking at? http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt specifically says in section 2.5 that all unicode characters are meant to be supported. So now you're wrong twice.
- gnaritas 12y agoTry learning something jackass: http://timelessrepo.com/json-isnt-a-javascript-subset http://timelessrepo.com/json-isnt-a-javascript-subset