You echo my thoughts on the issue. But what really bothers me is the logical outgrowth of that logic. What I mean is, as you said, most agree the planet is get

You echo my thoughts on the issue. But what really bothers me is the logical outgrowth of that logic. What I mean is, as you said, most agree the planet is getting warmer. That's the actual problem here. But Global Warming advocates are so convinced of their absolute infallibility that they're suggesting a solution based on a cause they can't prove. So my question is "What if they're wrong?" If the Global Warming movement really believes this trend will lead to the end of life as we know it shouldn't they be considering all options? Shouldn't someone be talking about ways to live if their climate predictions are correct and we aren't the cause? The fact that they completely ignore that side of the issue tells me their pushing an agenda not trying to solve the actual problem.