3 ms·
Are you referencing this thread? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/zfs-macos/qguq6LCf1QQ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/zfs-macos/qguq6LCf1Q...
by po 12y ago
Are you referencing this thread? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/zfs-macos/qguq6LCf1QQ https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/zfs-macos/qguq6LCf1Q...
I've heard this but I haven't actually confirmed anywhere official that ZFS will try to scrub your data due to a parity flip in ram values. Where in the manuals do they talk about it? (I'm actually curious about if it's just a rumor or if it's acknowledged)
- valarauca1 12y agoReferencing this https://pthree.org/2013/12/10/zfs-administration-appendix-c-why-you-should-use-ecc-ram/ https://pthree.org/2013/12/10/zfs-administration-appendix-c-... http://louwrentius.com/please-use-zfs-with-ecc-memory.html http://louwrentius.com/please-use-zfs-with-ecc-memory.html
- po 12y agoEven after reading that, I'm still not convinced it's any worse than something like btrfs+non-ECC memory. The most convincing part is the 'there are less tools' to recover from corruption angle.