Obama didn't announce himself as "a committed socialist", and the 'conservative media' that would denounce Obama as a socialist and the 'conservative media' tha

Obama didn't announce himself as "a committed socialist", and the 'conservative media' that would denounce Obama as a socialist and the 'conservative media' that would consider socialism negative are two (but not mutually exclusive) things. Most of the worlds' conservative media would react poorly to socialism due to the stigmas its' history has created, whereas American 'conservative media' would be more interested in painting its' leader in some specific way. Neither has anything to do with socialism being implacably good or bad, or the article at hand. What's your point?