3 ms·
Feynman is splendid, like always. For my understanding, his reasoning is much clearer and less artificially complex than Sartres. Thanks for posting this.
by mironathetin 12y ago
Feynman is splendid, like always. For my understanding, his reasoning is much clearer and less artificially complex than Sartres.
Thanks for posting this.
- stephancoral 12y agoSarte's reasoning is pretty simple: he doesn't want to become a component of an institution. He wants to be able to write as Jean-Paul Sartre, not Jean-Paul Sartre the Nobel Prize winner.
- hueving 12y agoThat thinking is flawed though. A prize doesn't define you by accepting it. When I am given a birthday cake, I don't then become "heuving, the receiver of birthday cakes". The only reason that really makes sense to decline a prize is if you are heavily opposed to what the institution represents. However, he didn't strike me as anti-intellectual.