He criticised Unix and the wrote how he and the GNOME team planned to fix the problems he delineated. If you agree with his analysis, that makes him a huge boo

He criticised Unix and the wrote how he and the GNOME team planned to fix the problems he delineated. If you agree with his analysis, that makes him a huge boon to the Unix community, not a traitor. Even if you disagree with his analysis, that doesn't make him a traitor--it makes him a Unix developer who has ideas you do not agree with. You'd have to prove his purposely trying to destroy the Unix community to call him a traitor.