> The misquote is close enough. No it isn't, you proceed to misquote him again by missing out half of his point. > Years later and people are still defending

> The misquote is close enough. No it isn't, you proceed to misquote him again by missing out half of his point. > Years later and people are still defending the indefensible by calling into question the messengers instead of responding to his actual message. Then quote his goddamn message, instead of cutting it in half.