4 ms·
I'm a bit worried that, because of weird locally-smart but globally-dumb incentives, we might see people consuming 1 KWh to capture a unit of CO2, but the gener
by danielweber 12y ago
I'm a bit worried that, because of weird locally-smart but globally-dumb incentives, we might see people consuming 1 KWh to capture a unit of CO2, but the generation of 1 KWh puts more than 1 unit of CO2 into the atmosphere.
I'd like to see the numbers.
EDIT:
The worst coal emits 2.18 pounds of CO2 per KWh.[1] As little as 917Kwh of energy puts a ton of CO2 into the air.
They say that can do it for "$15 to $50 a ton". How much of that is energy costs? $50 buys 500KWh, so even if you used coal to operate it, it would net remove carbon from the air.
I'd still like to see a plant using nuclear energy to change CO2 into fossil fuel, though.
[1] http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=74&t=11 http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=74&t=11
- ChuckMcM 12y agoThat would be an effective way to arbitrage the cost of carbon which isn't externalized on the power plant. However I don't think it would come to that. I'm surprised the SRI effort isn't recovering the CO2 (they claim to be venting it). After all if they really do think they can get $100 a ton for it and make it at $50 a ton, that would at least offset some of their research costs.