3 ms·
> Javascript is an innocent bystander in the mess. No, it's not, because well-formed, valid Javascript code is permitted to depend on this execution model.
by gdp 17y ago
> Javascript is an innocent bystander in the mess.
No, it's not, because well-formed, valid Javascript code is permitted to depend on this execution model.
- axod 17y agoYou're not making any sense whatsoever any more. The decision to combine 20 <script> sources into the same execution context is the BROWSERS decision. NOT javascripts. It's the BROWSER that doesn't have any concept of allowing <script> fine grained permissions within the execution context, or specifying you'd prefer if the browser put that script in a separate execution context. It's the BROWSER that needs fixing here, not js.
- gdp 17y agoI'll refer you to this comment now, as we appear to be arguing about the same thing in two threads: http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=843320 http://news.ycombinator.org/item?id=843320