4 ms·
I think it all but caught up lately in VP8 vs h.264 performance. Google kept improving VP8 performance. However, webm has also added VP9 support recently, which
by higherpurpose 12y ago
I think it all but caught up lately in VP8 vs h.264 performance. Google kept improving VP8 performance. However, webm has also added VP9 support recently, which is clearly superior.
- wlesieutre 12y agoIs VP9 in much use (compared to VP8)? I've definitely heard good things about it, but I have no idea how well supported it is or whether anybody has it in use yet.
- fleitz 12y agoOh does my iPhone have a VP9 chip in it? Not so superior...
- bqe 12y agoThis is not true. My work, written three years ago, showed that VP8 was inferior to H.264[1] at the time. A more recent paper showed that both VP8 and VP9 are inferior to both H.264 and HEVC[2]. [1]: http://blog.seancassidy.me/h264-and-vp8-compared.html http://blog.seancassidy.me/h264-and-vp8-compared.html [2]: http://iphome.hhi.de/marpe/download/Performance_HEVC_VP9_X264_PCS_2013_preprint.pdf http://iphome.hhi.de/marpe/download/Performance_HEVC_VP9_X26...