25 ms·
Well, it could simply just mean that others have surpassed them in terms of overall wealth, sure. Not that they lost the wealth.
by zo1 12y ago
Well, it could simply just mean that others have surpassed them in terms of overall wealth, sure. Not that they lost the wealth.
- dageshi 12y agoPresumably very few people in that list are rich in purely cash or near cash terms. They're rich because they own businesses at the apex of their valuation? As technology changes businesses rise and fall which probably accounts for the turnover in the list.