2 ms·

> Ok then I guess I don't understand your point sorry for that. the logic chain is a bit long... I was working on exploiting the problem of the statement "if C

by v-yadli 12y ago

> Ok then I guess I don't understand your point sorry for that. the logic chain is a bit long... I was working on exploiting the problem of the statement "if Chinese people have Maker culture there will be (same_ratio * population_base) open source projects". I should have quoted it there. Anyway there's one thing clear (for me), that one create and share when he/she stops struggling for living. So ok here's a better model: (same_ratio * max(0, non_struggling_population(china)) But given the fact that open source didn't make it here, this one doesn't make sense (because I know that some little portion of this huge base is really not struggling). nevermind: (get_ratio_by_culture(china) * max( ..... )) ^ `this is what we get at this point. Ugh, too simple isn't it, I'd really like to see something more interesting. Let's first not introduce forums, IM groups of producers. Just consider one thing: Chinese people crack things. The more 'struggling' they are, the more they crack, but the skill gets lower. Say that now we have a close source binary. Some top-notched hackers extracted/disassembled the code to make it more readable, and runnable. (Maybe they're from Russia, just sayin :-D Lower tier programmers bind hooks to the routines. Lower tier programmers use editors to iterate through the binary to seek for useful literals, inject resources to make mods... Lower tier resellers, though not capable of these technical stuff, are able to follow the tutorials released by all higher tiers, and subtly modify the thing. And this model suddenly becomes a non-deterministic close-source-binary cracking ecosystem, that tries many possible solutions simultaneously, and hierarchically(given the fan-out factor high enough between each two tiers). Yeah I know you would never say this is "good". But I think this is at least mathematically interesting. And it gives some sense to how to utilize this kind of ecosystems to do something real(though this model is still far from realistic). > I would say that both Japan and Korea are ahead Sure. Just consider get_ratio_by_culture() and non_struggling_population(). get_ratio_by_culture() is similar. It doesn't mean the current whole picture is similar. But the later one is variable and the former one is nearly const.

chaostheory 12y ago
Here's the thing. Having a majority lower class population is a not a good excuse for the lack of innovation. In the 19th century, approximately 80% of the population in the West was working class. You can say that the population more closely mirrors China's population today, where the population is poor but very skilled. Despite the disadvantages of most of the population, the West was still extremely innovative. Another trend that gets exposed here is that anytime anyone has a valid criticism of China, the inevitable "China is still developing" or "Most of China's population is poor" excuse tends to come up. At the end of the day, the true reason for the lack of mainland Chinese innovation is probably the suppression of freedom by the CCP as well as the culture that is created from a low trust society due to the CCP's corruption. It's hard to be creative when you have to think about what you can and can't say or type, as well as missing out on the ideas that could have been shared, but have not due to the lack of free expression. Unless things change, China will never become much more than a larger and larger photocopier. HK is the first test. Maybe the only place China can innovate are in sectors that have legal controls in the West like bioengineering.

by v-yadli 12y ago

chaostheory 12y ago

Here's the thing. Having a majority lower class population is a not a good excuse for the lack of innovation. In the 19th century, approximately 80% of the population in the West was working class. You can say that the population more closely mirrors China's population today, where the population is poor but very skilled. Despite the disadvantages of most of the population, the West was still extremely innovative. Another trend that gets exposed here is that anytime anyone has a valid criticism of China, the inevitable "China is still developing" or "Most of China's population is poor" excuse tends to come up. At the end of the day, the true reason for the lack of mainland Chinese innovation is probably the suppression of freedom by the CCP as well as the culture that is created from a low trust society due to the CCP's corruption. It's hard to be creative when you have to think about what you can and can't say or type, as well as missing out on the ideas that could have been shared, but have not due to the lack of free expression. Unless things change, China will never become much more than a larger and larger photocopier. HK is the first test. Maybe the only place China can innovate are in sectors that have legal controls in the West like bioengineering.