15 ms·
(Ozgun from Citus Data here.) I updated the Readme, and added a second link to the original vectorization paper. We found that most benefits came from simply s
by ozgune 12y ago
(Ozgun from Citus Data here.)
I updated the Readme, and added a second link to the original vectorization paper. We found that most benefits came from simply switching to batch-processing; and that's why we referenced the more recent "vectorization vs LLVM" paper.
I'd say the original part of Can's work is that new ideas can be applied to PostgreSQL's robust and optimized executor, without touching any core logic. In that sense, it could also be relevant to this earlier thread on cstore: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7524886 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7524886
- alecco 12y agoYeah, I remember being downvoted without explanation.
- ozgune 12y agoFor clarification, it wasn't anyone from our team who downvoted any of these threads. All we can do on our part is to keep working on PostgreSQL to make it even better and faster, and to share our work with others in the community.