> case law isn't precisely explicit Huh? Of course it is - the case I'm referencing (Crowninshield v. Blaisdell) is explicitly regarding the classification of

> case law isn't precisely explicit Huh? Of course it is - the case I'm referencing (Crowninshield v. Blaisdell) is explicitly regarding the classification of short term rentals. The courts found them to be residential, not commercial (which makes sense, if it's a residential short term rental).