3 ms·
It isn't enabled by default so users still have to turn it on at this point. AdBlock was the highest voted feature that users wanted and was the biggest featur
by icefox 17y ago
It isn't enabled by default so users still have to turn it on at this point. AdBlock was the highest voted feature that users wanted and was the biggest feature I could include that Chrome could not. From a bang for my time/effort AdBlock was a winner.
- thaumaturgy 17y agoHallelujah! Thank you for making that leap. I'm no longer as fond of Firefox as I once was. It has persistent memory issues, and is getting more and more bloaty. But, it's also got AB+, and that for a lot of people is a killer feature. I think there are a bunch of sound counter-arguments to the people saying that AB+ will kill their websites: one, users are sick of websites with more advertising-related content than actual content; two, fake virus alerts and other related ads are now one of the most common vectors for new spyware and malware; three, the ad revenue model is already starting to fall over due to over saturation, and maybe it's time that website owners start looking for a better way to do it. So, thank you. I'll be trying out the next release of Arora.
- natrius 17y agoPassive AdBlock use is a very implicit, inconsiderate way of telling people to get a new business model. How about, "Hey, the ads on your site are annoying, and I think I almost got a virus from one. I suggest you fix it. In the meantime, I'm using AdBlock on your site." There are perfectly good reasons to block ads, but far too many people take a brute force approach to it that will result in good sites going away, or charging users instead of advertisers. I think both of those outcomes suck. If you want to block ads, I'm sure you can spare 30 seconds to let people know why and how to get you to stop.