3 ms·
That's what ASP.net ViewState does more or less. There's a lot of overhead and little gain IMO. I think it's best to transfer as little state as possible across
by webXL 12y ago
That's what ASP.net ViewState does more or less. There's a lot of overhead and little gain IMO. I think it's best to transfer as little state as possible across the wire for simplicity.
- barrkel 12y agoIt is not. ASP.net viewstate includes a serialization of a set of controls that, server-side, represent the state of the page. That's not what I'm talking about. This is why I think I need to write a toy language example - most people, given a brief outline of what I'm talking about, think I'm talking about something else they're more familiar with, and misunderstand.