Yes, locking private information is not DRM. But if you separate "private" information from "published" information, then for DRM to become [logically] evil, yo

Yes, locking private information is not DRM. But if you separate "private" information from "published" information, then for DRM to become [logically] evil, you should restate your claim about why is it evil to prevent unlimited sharing, because the generic "virtual restraints" on bits no longer works.