3 ms·
We've been disappointed, in some way or another, with almost every one we've tried as well. Interestingly, one of our uses of Tokyo cabinet completely choked a
by stephenjudkins 17y ago
We've been disappointed, in some way or another, with almost every one we've tried as well. Interestingly, one of our uses of Tokyo cabinet completely choked at somewhere between 60-70gb of data.
At the same time, these articles can be very valuable for us right now. Yes, this particular piece is a bit fluffy, but they invite skepticism and many of the feedback people give.
We've never used Voldemort in production, but in heavy load testing we were able to stuff in a few hundred million records with only three instances. Retrieval remained acceptably quick, even while the inserts where going on. However, when we looked it didn't support repartitioning/rebalancing of the data set. This may have changed.
Cassandra and MongoDB offer a great deal more functionality than, say, Voldemort or Tokyo. Cassandra seems like a really awesome choice, but is currently under heavy development.