3 ms·
Batteries are ~30% efficient. Sending power to end users is ~85-90% efficient (though less, of course, if there's overcapacity, and then it drops very fast). S
by waps 12y ago
Batteries are ~30% efficient. Sending power to end users is ~85-90% efficient (though less, of course, if there's overcapacity, and then it drops very fast).
So let's say you'd get 30% * 85% ^ 2 ~= 20% efficiency out of it.
If you're talking Australia. Outside of CBDs, why would you so much as bother with a grid connection at all ? Solar panels + a solar boiler + in-house batteries will probably be about as reliable as grid power in Australia. Plus it'd be truly distributed.
What we need is a Solarcity company in Australia.
(Or, Australia has uranium mines ... why not go nuclear ? Fuel is free)
- D_Alex 12y ago>Batteries are ~30% efficient Citation needed. Lowest claim I recall is "better than 85%". Also, I support nuclear power for Australia. It makes so much sense in a politically and geologically stable location, with plenty of empty spaces. Own fuel supply is icing on cake.
- spacefight 12y ago"politically and geologically" That might not be the case for the runtime of the nuclear power plant. Think 40y ahead. I can't.