I agree with your general sentiment but that's not what I got out of this article. The article doesn't say much about dynamic vs static typing, it merely says s

I agree with your general sentiment but that's not what I got out of this article. The article doesn't say much about dynamic vs static typing, it merely says something about the arguments around dynamic vs static typing, and it's spot on in that respect. I personally believe static typing to be better than dynamic typing, but at the same time most of the arguments for static typing that I read on the internet are terrible or incredibly exaggerated.