Do claimants get litigation strikes when they claim something that someone rejects and they aren't willing to sue over? It seems like this system would level o

Do claimants get litigation strikes when they claim something that someone rejects and they aren't willing to sue over? It seems like this system would level out a lot of claimants had to agree to pursuit legal action before making claims. Right now they have broad abilities to make claims without backing them up which disproportionately punishes users and creators. I absolutely believe that people who violate the law should go to court, but the current landscape puts the user in a very disadvantaged position and there appears (at least externally) to be no long term "permanent record" for litigious content owners w/r/t claims vs. rejected claims. At some point they should no longer be able to make claims.