43 ms·

This seems highly dependent on Javascript for displaying its (actually static) content. As someone who likes his notebook fan to stay calm and not have websites

by aw3c2 12y ago

This seems highly dependent on Javascript for displaying its (actually static) content. As someone who likes his notebook fan to stay calm and not have websites shove obnoxious things into her face and thus browses with JS off by default, please do not require Javascript to read your documentation. JS is nice for animations or truly dynamic content, but why require it for static things like this?

agilebyte 12y ago
I am just guessing, but the site uses CodeMirror (JS) to do syntax highlighting.
- aw3c2 12y ago
  Check out the examples, they load content via JS.
  - agilebyte 12y ago
    Oh sorry, you meant why does it use JS to load content and not why it uses JS at all.