4 ms·
That would be a radically dangerous position to adopt. It is exactly the position which fueled colonialism. They thought they had grown up as well and were in
by otakucode 12y ago
That would be a radically dangerous position to adopt. It is exactly the position which fueled colonialism. They thought they had grown up as well and were in a position to 'help' the rest of humanity grow with them - into being driven primarily by economic motives dedicated to suppressing every counter-productive urge to pleasure that humans experience.
And, of course, the Holocaust was supported by this exact argument as well. We'd developed enough that we knew how to improve the human race - eugenics. We knew how to improve 'mental hygeine'. All that was required was hard men making the hard choices, overcoming the weaknesses of empathy and compassion for the greater good. And the people lapped it up. That is a dangerous area to tread upon. We should always be humble in our knowledge, and parsimonious in its application.
- Houshalter 12y agoThese analogies are forced to fit your narrative. By your logic we should never do anything because future generations may realize we were wrong. Colonialists didn't care about helping natives, they wanted their resources. Whether or not eugenics could work was never in question. It was whether it was moral. The holocaust was motivated primarily by hatred, not merely misguided attempts at improving the world.