3 ms·
If you equate "slow" with "wasting time" you have very clearly missed the point. "Move fast and break things" works only when the value of, and audience for, y
by john_b 12y ago
If you equate "slow" with "wasting time" you have very clearly missed the point.
"Move fast and break things" works only when the value of, and audience for, your work is highly uncertain. If you have any confidence whatsoever in the value or audience of what you're building, slow is usually better.
Going fast in the wrong direction is only a good use of time and resources when you quickly recognize the mistake and turn around. In my experience, most people who prioritize speed above all else are hellbent on a specific destination and won't change course until it's too late.
- chasing 12y agoWell, my point is that it's a little silly to decide that "slow" is always better than "fast." Or vice versa. You wind up with platitudes that are vague to the point of absurdity. Like: "Slow is usually better." Of course you shouldn't universally prioritize speed above all else. That'd be dumb. You shouldn't rush through something that should be done with careful deliberation. You also shouldn't linger on something when time is of the essence.