3 ms·
> Plus, because Clojure is less statically typed than Java, Java typing idioms don't clash with Clojure's Well, you made me laugh. :) But the real deal is com
by noelwelsh 12y ago
> Plus, because Clojure is less statically typed than Java, Java typing idioms don't clash with Clojure's
Well, you made me laugh. :)
But the real deal is compiling stuff to JVM bytecode ahead of time, which Java code can then be compiled against. It's not clear to me that Clojure provides this, which is what I was getting at.
- pron 12y agoOf course Clojure does this. Clojure doesn't even have an interpreter.