4 ms·
I am interested in references to these claims.
by reirob 12y ago
I am interested in references to these claims.
- NickPollard 12y agoHere's one from Scientific American: In fact, the fly ash emitted by a power plant—a by-product from burning coal for electricity—carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-radioactive-than-nuclear-waste/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coal-ash-is-more-r...
- mnw21cam 12y agoA good place to find this sort of info is "Sustainable Energy Without The Hot Air", http://www.withouthotair.com/ http://www.withouthotair.com/ Page 168 mentions the fact that coal ash contains uranium, and that people living near coal power stations are exposed to more radiation than those living near nuclear power stations.