4 ms·
It's not unreasonable to assume Google/Facebook considering their market share (especially if you count Google's control over Android). http://www.marketingchar
by cheepin 12y ago
It's not unreasonable to assume Google/Facebook considering their market share (especially if you count Google's control over Android). http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/top-10-social-networking-websites-forums-february-2014-41104/ http://www.marketingcharts.com/updates/top-10-social-network...
- shmerl 12y agoMarket share doesn't preclude the existence of choice. So the article shouldn't put it as if there aren't any better alternatives.
- HaloZero 12y agoIn the case of social networks where a network is only as useful as the other people on it, it might not necessitate that there is no alternative but practically there isn't.
- shmerl 12y agoDiaspora* is quite useful for a constantly growing number of users. Your thesis however is wrong, which is demonstrated by the fact that any network starts with no users. I.e. any network goes through the growth process, when newcomers see it as rather barren in the early days. Diaspora* isn't at that stage anymore.