The article hit the nail on the head. It is a no-win scenario. Having watched many law professors give lectures on this very topic and something they always mak

The article hit the nail on the head. It is a no-win scenario. Having watched many law professors give lectures on this very topic and something they always make sure to point out, the issue that I always have with it is the wording: "Anything you say or do may (or can and will for modern readings) be used against you in a court of law" What it does not say is it can be used for you. What would of changed if Tom knew that showing good human conscious would help him in court? Yet the Miranda Warning worded to say nothing good can come out of this for you, that is I have absolutely nothing to gain by talking to you. It's a lose-lose situation. Could you imagine the frustration?