4 ms·

haha, it's not so black and white for me. I can't swear loyalty to any one platform because I'm too curious not to try them all. I LOVE working in .NET, it has

by thismat 17y ago

haha, it's not so black and white for me. I can't swear loyalty to any one platform because I'm too curious not to try them all. I LOVE working in .NET, it has taught me a lot, I don't want to switch away from it....on the same note I LOVE working with Rails, it's a pleasure, pretty, 'feels good writing' framework, that has also, taught me a lot. I'm the same with with operating systems, I like using them all (now that I have Windows 7 that is), so I have a desktop PC for Win7+VS+Gaming, my macbook for LAMP style development and my Linode VPS for handling my own *nix server and bash/shell/testing/personal hosting...I just can't switch to one platform when they all have a different purpose..right tool for the job kind of thing. Really, I just like to mix it up, I don't want to get locked into any one platform, but if a job pops up that the client wants .NET, why not do it with free professional level software?

thenduks 17y ago
Everything you say makes sense to me. ...Except that last part. If a job pops up and a client wants .NET, I would strongly encourage them against it. Why? Well like you said, you don't want to be locked in. Why would you be ok with locking in the client? If that client's site gets bigger and they need another box or what-have-you -- oops, that's another X thousand dollars for another license, etc. That sort of thing would not be ok with me. Of course, I'm not a freelancer, so maybe my take on client-is-always-right will vary wildly from yours :)
- thismat 17y ago
  No I agree, I would prefer not to work in .NET for my personal development honestly, but I do know that like my shop, some corporations or small businesses are already locked into the Microsoft stack, and won't consider something like Rails or Django for their production applications. Obviously these are normally for more business oriented, intranet style applications, not normally public sites, so scaling is a little different and normally they will have their own server licenses already.

by thismat 17y ago

thenduks 17y ago

Everything you say makes sense to me. ...Except that last part. If a job pops up and a client wants .NET, I would strongly encourage them against it. Why? Well like you said, you don't want to be locked in. Why would you be ok with locking in the client? If that client's site gets bigger and they need another box or what-have-you -- oops, that's another X thousand dollars for another license, etc. That sort of thing would not be ok with me. Of course, I'm not a freelancer, so maybe my take on client-is-always-right will vary wildly from yours :)

thismat 17y ago
No I agree, I would prefer not to work in .NET for my personal development honestly, but I do know that like my shop, some corporations or small businesses are already locked into the Microsoft stack, and won't consider something like Rails or Django for their production applications. Obviously these are normally for more business oriented, intranet style applications, not normally public sites, so scaling is a little different and normally they will have their own server licenses already.