It's quite possible to be angry about something, and also be polite in ones response. This is also revealing: the idea that it is somehow dishonest if one choo

It's quite possible to be angry about something, and also be polite in ones response. This is also revealing: the idea that it is somehow dishonest if one chooses to not publicly verbalize one's own internal state. We should think about that for a moment. This is the proposal: "I am being dishonest unless I verbalize my anger about a topic." I would submit that dishonestly would require a more direct statement. "I am not angry about your continued choices for ignorance." That would be dishonest. In my opinion, not saying anything about one's internal state can't be dishonest. No information was given.