4 ms·

But clearly the issue here is not compensation for the workers. The issue is cost of license. Consider this hypothetical: 1. Country A - taxi license costs $30

• pron 12y ago
  The structure of the arrangement between taxi companies and the government is different in each area, and is subject both to particular deals struck (and I don't mean that in a bad way, though sometimes it is) and to whatever extra safety procedures the government wants to enforce. For example, a country should be free to require an expensive insurance from taxi drivers, as well as background checks as means to preventing future costs, or as part of a deal. Thing is, Travis Kalanick and his ilk are trying to restrict our freedom to choose what's right for our community, as if there's only one way to run an economy, and as if they know what it is.
  • omonra 12y ago
    Color me cynical, but I think that most of opposition to Uber stems not from desire for safety but simple desire to protect the incumbent profits. Moreover - the 'community' isn't really choosing anything. Instead it's some crony local politicians in the pocket of taxi lobby. If you want to do a referendum on whether Uber should be operating - I'll agree on the 'community' stance. Otherwise it's the minority who have the most to lose advocating against it.